The news, distilled into what matters.
Defense in Charlie Kirk's killing say shooter should not get death penalty, hit 'intended target'
- Defense argues the death penalty shouldn't apply because the bullet allegedly traveled above the crowd and only hit the intended target, so no one else was put in danger.
- Prosecutors counter with DNA tied to the weapon, alleged confessions, and a possible political motive tied to Kirk’s views that could increase charges.
- The case is still unfolding—prosecutors must respond by Aug. 18 and closing arguments in the preliminary hearing are set for Sept. 1 before a judge decides if it goes to trial.
Read full article
Get the full experience in the app — topics, comments, and audio summaries.